Document Type


Publication Title

SMU Law Review

Publication Date

Winter 2000


Our purpose in this essay is to describe (in the first section) how judges read statutes and the problems they incur in this effort. It is against this interpretive regime that Justice Scalia has rebelled. Against this regime we will then (in the second section) explore Justice Scalia's criticism and measure his successes.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.