Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
This Article seeks to strengthen the case for the academy and the legal profession to pay heed to the consequences of the shift to electronic research, primarily by employing cognitive psychology to guide predictions about the impacts of the shift and, thereby, address a perceived credibility gap. This credibility gap arises from the difficulty and imprecision in postulating how changes in the research process translate into changes in researcher behavior and research outcomes. Applying principles of cognitive psychology to compare the print and electronic research processes provides an analytical basis for connecting changes in the research process with changes in researcher behavior and research outcomes.
Katrina Fischer Kuh,
Electronically Manufactured Law, 22 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 223
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/593