Hofstra Law Review


J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Rytex Corp. provided the New York Court of Appeals with an excellent opportunity to resolve the vexing problem caused by an arbitrator's duty to disclose information likely to create an impression of bias. Unfortunately, rather than formulate a logical rubric for deciding future cases, the court made inconsistent statements which will only nurture the confusion and uncertainty that has already characterized this issue.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.