Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin

Authors

Morton Jeremiah Marshack

Abstract

This casenote will deal with the following class action issues which the Court considered: the appealability of pre-trial rulings; the notice requirements of rule 23(c)(2); the propriety of initially apportioning the cost of notice between the plaintiff and the defendant; the use of preliminary hearings; and the availability of a subclass action alternative.

Recommended Citation

Marshack, Morton Jeremiah (1975) "Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 9.
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol3/iss1/9