Hofstra Law Review
Abstract
This casenote will deal with the following class action issues which the Court considered: the appealability of pre-trial rulings; the notice requirements of rule 23(c)(2); the propriety of initially apportioning the cost of notice between the plaintiff and the defendant; the use of preliminary hearings; and the availability of a subclass action alternative.
Recommended Citation
Marshack, Morton Jeremiah
(1975)
"Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin,"
Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 3:
Iss.
1, Article 9.
Available at:
https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol3/iss1/9