In Praise of Overzealous Representation - Lying to Judges, Deceiving Third Parties, and Other Ethical Conduct

Authors

Monroe H. Freedman, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra UniversityFollow

Abstract

Three ethical rules are both clear and highly desirable - MR 3.3(a)(1), which forbids a lawyer to make a false statement of fact to a tribunal; MR 4.1(a), which forbids a lawyer to make a false statement of material fact to a third person; and MR 8.4(c), which proscribes conductinvolving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Nevertheless, by considering the larger legal context of the lawyer's role, by understanding inconsistent ethical rules in the light of reason, and by applying insights of moral philosophy, this article concludes that there are circumstances in which a lawyer can ethically make a false statement of fact to a tribunal, can ethically make a false statement of material fact to a third person, and can ethically engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Recommended Citation

Freedman, Monroe H. (2006) "In Praise of Overzealous Representation - Lying to Judges, Deceiving Third Parties, and Other Ethical Conduct," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 34: Iss. 3, Article 6.
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol34/iss3/6