•  
  •  
 

Hofstra Law Review

Authors

Eric LaneFollow

Abstract

In the years before and after the ratification of the United States Constitution, James Madison offered, unsuccessfully, the view that a formal bill of rights would not safeguard individual liberties in the face of excessive federal power or the failure of the system of checks and balances. An examination of New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) treatment of Muslim-Americans in the years following the September 11, 2001 (“9/11”) attacks reveals the wisdom of Madison’s prediction. Since 9/11, the NYPD has espoused the view that the only way to prevent future terrorist attacks is to closely monitor Muslim communities, in case an “unremarkable” Muslim descends into “jihadization.” Such surveillance has serious consequences for the identity and economic and psychological health of the Muslim-American population. However, the author predicts that neither elected officials nor the courts will take steps to curb the NYPD’s surveillance strategy. This article asserts that, as Madison warned, the Bill of Rights will not stop the security of the majority from reigning over the individual liberties of the few.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.