Hofstra Law Review


It is the thesis of this article that the admissibility of coconspirators' statements is a matter that must be decided by the jury. This approach, which is the traditional mode, presently competes for judicial favor with a revisionary rule. The revisionary rule places responsibility for deciding the preliminary issue with the judge, and, in at least the Second Circuit, permits admission without proof sufficient to create a prima facie case. The traditional approach better resolves the policy question. It is also a procedure that is mandated by the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.