Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Touro Law Review

Publication Date

Spring 2000

Abstract

There were two Supreme Court cases on qualified immunity. I want to be sure to cover those. There was also a case that was almost decided by the Court and I would like to spend a little more attention on that one.

The cases on qualified immunity that were decided emphasized and perhaps changed the law, a little bit, on the sequence of deciding issues in a section 1983 case. At one time, when someone would assert that his or her constitutional rights were violated, the defense to such an assertion was that this is not a constitutional right. Even if there was a constitutional right, there is doubt as to whether such a right was clearly established, thereby entitling the government official to qualified immunity. The courts for the most part would not get into the issue of whether there was a constitutional right because in any event the right was not clearly established at the time. The Supreme Court dealt with that issue a second time, and it is an easy way to get out of the whole issue.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.