Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Washington University Law Quarterly
Publication Date
2005
Abstract
Raging national debates about the relationship of church and state often find parties sparring over whether the government is treating religious interests equally. This essay endeavors to explain why there is such widespread disagreement about the meaning of religious equality. It explores both jurisprudential and doctrinal sources of dispute, including: the multidimensional nature of equality generally, the uniqueness of religion, the difficulty of defining religion, and the problem of identifying the proper baseline or point of comparison for assessing religious equality. Ultimately, we cannot separate issues of religious equality from disputes about the meaning of the Constitution's religion clauses. The essay presents the thesis that, on a collective level, we may suffer from a long-standing, national uncertainty or ambiguity about religion and the ideal relationship between church and state, accounting in part for our endless conflict over the meaning of the religion clauses. The essay concludes by examining whether it is possible to resolve or avoid questions of religious equality and, if not, what useful lesson can be drawn from our uncertain history. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
Recommended Citation
Robin Charlow,
The Elusive Meaning of Religious Equality, 83 Wash. U. L. Quarterly 1529
(2005)
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/683